sex

You are currently browsing the archive for the sex category.

A call for papers comes via the Filament magazine FB page, Feminst Porn Studies is looking for papers between 3000 and 7000 words from both sex industry workers and academic writers.

Oxford University’s Left Review is looking for submissions for Issue Three, which gives you two weeks to submit if you have any sociological, radical politics or economics papers.

When it comes to Filament magazine, I’m still in two minds about it. Yes, I like looking at sexy men and yes Ii think women should be able to access porn if they want to.  What I can’t actually bridge is the gap between the following-  when did I start thinking it was OK to view men as sex objects when most feminist thought dictates that women must not be seen purely as sex objects? Surely as a result,  neither should men.  What is this female gaze discussion all about?

The female gaze can be seen as  binary to the male gaze, but how do we truly know what the female gaze is?  If it is the  opposite to the male gaze then where is the space for Lesbians and Trans men? I know that all men do not not desire the slim blonde identikit archetype offered by the media, and all women do not desire the chiseled  jaw six pack ‘hunk’ also offered by the mainstream.  Nor are all women ‘secret bisexuals’, so why are the main images in this magazine oiled up and laid out for the ladies pleasure?

As a critic of post-feminism, I could simply say that this is  a new and improved way to control women’s sexuality, to mould us as sexually subservient to men. Don’t be fooled by embracing the so-called power of what I truly think the female gaze is . The male gaze is digested in the consciousness of women, who then internalise and invert this gaze because ultimately  men have power. To seize this power you must be seen as this veracious, ironic being who sees women as the media do- as a consumable product . Ariel Levy in her excellent investigation ‘ Female Chauvinist Pigs’ explores this notion within both heterosexual and homosexual culture and illustrates this perfectly.

As a woman in the ‘real’ world, having been socially conditioned to what is ‘hot’ and what is not (lets not be naive here), maybe Filament is a good  thing. I enjoy reading the feeds on FB  asking for what kind of image the readers would like to see ( I can’t help but think that it may sink into a readers boyfriends/husbands expo).  Most of the articles are pretty good and I don’t think I’d ever put it under my bed to avoid detection. That said, can any sexual objectification ever be justified?

Tags: , , , , , ,

The silent death is cervical cancer. I knew a little about cervical cancer, skipped appointments for the screening because its embarrassing and uncomfortable and occasionally when I did turn up got the ‘abnormal’ diagnosis. I had the abnormal diagnosis three times ,dutifully turned up at the hospital, had an electrode strapped to my thigh in order to power the electric cheese wire that sliced off the abnormal white spots in my cervix. Was I scared?  No- in fact I got quite blase about it- after all I’m young , healthy and I’ve had kids (some doctors I saw when I was younger, claimed that most ‘womens’ problems disappear after having kids!). Then came Jade Goody.

Has Jade Goody done for cervical cancer what Kylie Minogue did for breast cancer? The signs look good-  an average figure for more women going for smear tests is 40%,  so the short life of Goody was not in vain. What is never discussed in the media is one of the real reasons behind why women don’t go for smear tests. Women have that discussion- its embarrasing , sometimes it hurts, you worry about what the doctor or nurse thinks about your pubic hair, does your vagina look ‘normal’? Does it have a funny smell?

Ultimately its the invasision of privacy-  knickers off , lie on the bed and open your legs to ,sometimes, a complete stranger, and then have a cold instrument inserted in order to take a sample of cells. Ok prevention is better than a cure and early detection is crucial, but in these days of stem cell research , the mode of injecting medicine through the pores rather than injection and keyhole hysterectomies is there any possibility of a non invasive way of detecting cervical cancer?

Reading this article today, I sometimes find it hard to believe I live in the 21st century. Yet again, it’s an example of the commodification of sex, in the boundaries of a sexual relationship. This time as a ‘gift’,  rather than a bargaining chip orrevenge tactic .

“Hmm, what can I get my partner for their birthday?  Oh!  I know-  sex everyday for the next year !” When sex is gift wrapped, it is implied that it is paid for, made attractive and, ultimately,  only for the enjoyment of the recipient. Any comparisons between prostitution and the gift of sex is obvious. We all know that sex is important, but it is in fact,  a physical and emotional exchange between consenting adults and not something on a ‘to do’  list.

We all lead busy lives- there’s work , mundane day to day stuff to do and so on.  Should sex be seen as a item on a list to tick off ? I say no. On hearing experinces of couples trying to concieve they often say having sex to order, made sex just an act, a means to an end. Men and women often say they’d like more sex,  but is it because that is what the media portrays to us ?  If we aren’t having great sex and lots of it we are obvious inadequate and unattractive.  Is this why this woman decided to give her husband the gift of sex?

Tags: , , , , , ,

Browsing the net tonight I found two articles that caught my eye , over on Feministing ,about a lesbian being chased off and effectively banned from x-box live and the other over on the F-word about female I.T workers quitting their jobs because of the industry’s sexism.

To be honest , at first, I thought the headline `Lesbian banned from X-box live!` was a headline straight out of  The Sun in the `Freddie Starr ate my hamster` mould. It was absolutely ridiculous and laughed until I checked  out the whole article. I started to think about the last x-box game I completed (Fable II ), its a role playing game with fighting,magic and relies on interpersonal responses with the game virtual characters in order to fully assess renown.

Did it matter if I was a male or female character? A main unlock achievement in the game is to get married and was it a problem if I chose a member of the same sex? No .So sexuality equality is creeping into some games these days ,so why does it matter if you express your sexuality or just simply experiment? Its the old chestnut `just think about the children!` panic , in other terms ‘I don’t want to explain why some people have different sexualities , it makes me uncomfortable’.

That comment pointed to me over to the furor over a disabled woman presenting kids TV. A women with one able arm is presenting toddler t.v . So what?  most of the rational thinking population may think,but no, during a Radio 2 talk show a listener rang in and complained that this woman would give his kids nightmares. Well Mr phone man ,my kids are 3 and 4 and they didn’t bat an eyelid or comment on it!

Back to the game…upon completing the game I was shown the credits.  How many female programmers were credited? Two ,that’s right two. Out of thirty five! WTF! Why is that I thought to myself? Maybe I’m being naive here but I thought we lived in 2009 , and that technology and jobs within the tech industry were  about merit and not about gender. I’m wrong according to the excellent article over on The F-word. Sexism is rife in the I.T industry , apparently us ‘girls’ should stick to low paying call center jobs and making the tea at gaming studios.

I have now made a conscious decision to learn programming , I’m kind of into finding out what my p.c can do and regular readers know that I’m an advocate of open source software, and I like messing around with Linux operating system.

I used to work in pubs , I know that most men are socialized in a sexist manner but I thought that on-line we as women could be what we wanted to be , be it androgynous, lesbian, bisexual or a spider plankton from Mars. Who cares as long as you find  liberty and kinship which under pins the whole ethic of the World Wide Web or even the supposed male dominated Hacker world :-

“Hackers should be judged by their hacking , not bogus criteria such as degrees,age,race or position”.(Levy,S.Hackers(1994)Penguin.New York.

Tags: , , , , ,

The Bondage Argument

The Blogsphere is ringing this week with the sound of debating feminists/ pro feminists/other women identifying  peoples discussing BDSM and the agency and roles of women within BDSM sexual relationships.  I’m not going to link to the debates because a) I’m exhausted after attending double lectures and a talk on socialist feminism and b) I really don’t want to take a side in the existing debate, especially not at 10.30 at night, when I’m exhausted.

Mostly I just want a chance to open up a debate about Teh Kinky Sexzors without piggy backing off of someone else’s.

My opinions about sex pretty much run too – if it’s consenting, non- coerced, and involves people doing whatever they want to do to get each other off, providing no children, animals, dead people or unwilling participants etc involved, then people should do what they like. Essentially- do what you want with who you want providing there’s consent, sense, and equality in the room.

I can see, however, how and why there is a debate about how or not BDSM does or doesn’t hold up Patriarchy and existing, dominant ideas about sexuality, women’s sexuality and the kinds of sex we should all be having.

What disturbs me about some of these debates is, the perceived removal of women’s agency. One of the argument I’ve heard is that women don’t involve themselves in BDSM based sexual encounters because they really want too, they do it because patriarchy, porn, dominant cultural narratives and their (male) partners tell them they should.

This kind of thinking, in my opinion,  removes the agency of women who ARE engaging in BDSM because they want too, because they get off on it and so do their partners. I’m not for a second about to naively suggest that no woman has ever been co-erced into abusive situations involving BDSM- but I would argue that it they are co-erced then it’s not sex it’s rape, and that is a different ball game all together.

From the BDSM communities I’ve known of, safety and consent have been two of the most holy, cardinal rules ever. You don’t do a damn thing, if they or you aren’t fully aware and consenting. You don’t do a damn thing if they or you do not feel totally safe, and you have adequate safety measures in place- for some people that’s using condoms for others it’s safety words, reliable easily reached cutting equipment and first aid kits at the ready, just in case.

I’m confused by arguments that suggest we, as a movement, are fighting for women’s autonomy and agency to be recognized, whilst simultaneously denying women the right to have sex however they please. I CAN understand arguments focusing on women’s co-ercion into sexual behaviours, or women’s socialization into particular sexual roles.  What I can’t understand is why women, who are plainly choosing to engage in sex where they experiment in a number of ways with roles, identities, toys and boundaries are criticized and told they can’t possibly enjoy it, they’ve just been brainwashed.

How does dialogue like this help the movement? How does dialogue like this enable women from a variety of ideological positions to share experiences, beliefs and discussion about sex and women’s sexuality openly and honestly?

To me this standpoint of  agency denial, can be perceived as women hating, as much as, standpoints that suggests that women who freely enjoy sex are worthless or standpoints that suggest women shouldn’t have access to reproductive healthcare becuase they shouldn’t be having sex in the first place.

I would also like to question whether these arguments apply to lesbian/gay relationships. So far all the arguments I’ve read, have been about  heterosexual Dom/sub relationships and BDSM in heterosexual relationships. If a woman is the Dom in her lesbian Dom/sub relationship is that still upholding the Patriarchy? Does women dominating women, or tying women up count as internalized mysogyny? Answers in the comments section please!

I’m hoping this post will mean a discussion springs up. So far I’ve never deleted or modded a genuine comment anyone has made- I’m hoping this can continue. If you do comment (and please do- all viewpoints welcome) then please be mindful of your language and tolerant of the views of others.

Tags: , , , , , ,

Reading through the Sunday papers today two articles caught my eye.  The first one is an idiotic article regurgitating the same old nonsense about hetero women being attracted to rich men because its part of our genetic code. It was  “backed up” by a quote from a female Lawyer – well she’s a professional so it must be true! Apparently being a rich man gives you the capacity to deliver top notch orgasms which of course next to money are the only things we women require.

But wait… further on it stated that men can pick up how fertile a woman is , and this observation was concluded from watching men tip Lap Dancers. Apparently the more fertile you are the more you get tipped.

My question is do lesbians, transgender, infertile and women with poor partners therefore have really crap sex all the time? That’s what this *ahem* ‘scientific’ led piece suggests.

An excellent article over at  The Guardian points out that employers are more likely to dismiss women first because of the belief that there will be a man around to financially support her. Surely this a massive sign of sexism given that most households need two wages in order to survive? An adjoining article pointed out that just being financially secure does not eliminate the feeling of redundancy and social isolation. In short you can’t buy fulfillment.

The link in my mind is this – according to The Times article we hetero women can take the rough with smooth as long as we get a good orgasm out of it. According to The Guardian we can take the rough with the smooth as long as the goal of personal fulfillment is in sight. Sorry to be a spoilt brat but……….. I want both.

Tags: , , ,

Freely selling sex.

I have to say I’m a pro porn feminist- well by that I mean , I’m a pro porn-that-is-made-by-consenting-adults- who-are-appropriately-re-numerated-for-their-time-and-who-have-working-conditions-that-are-as-safe-as-possible feminist. I’m anti trafficking, and I’m against a society that forces women into sex work, because they feel they have no other options or skills with which to generate much needed income. I’m not against women (or men for that matter) going into sex work because they enjoy it, or because they truly and freely want too. Before you tell me no woman could ever possibly be like that and all sex workers are forced, are suffering from deprivation or have drug/alcohol/psychological problems I suggest you go and read the blog of Renegade Evolution (NSFW), who is quite frankly damned awesome and was one of the first people ever to comment on my blog,  and then read Diablo Cody’s book Candy Girl about her experiences of stripping and the reasons why she did it.

If you don’t want to go and do that, then do go and read this awesome post by Renee at Womanist Musings. I’m particularly fond of this section :

This is not a profession that I would choose for myself but because I ultimately believe in the right of a woman to have control over her body and her sexuality I cannot sit in judgement of the result of where that decision leads.  My concerns are for the ones that are being prostituted without their consent.  My concerns are for those that are addicted, abused and raped.

That’s sums it up pretty well I think!



Tags: , , , , , , , ,

This post is my response to a part of Suzi`s post  `The Mummy Myth`and also  expresses my thoughts on female competitiveness.

To begin with lets look at the two -sided coin which is the mainstream media…..

Can anyone remember any obviously pregnant women presenting the weather, reading the news or presenting breakfast T.V in the eighties? The only woman I can remember is Janet Ellis who presented Blue Peter and was subjected to complaints from outraged viewers because she was a)pregnant and b) shock horror, also unmarried.

Fast forward to the here and now, and pregnant TV presenters are  commonplace,a good thing wouldn`t you say? Pregnant women can be seen, heard and are generally considered capable  enough to carrying on working in their high profile jobs. Of course, the maternity leave ,pay and birthing plan are all held in the public eye, and  maybe the expectant mother will do an interview with various magazines saying how wonderful she feels and how she now, inexplicably  likes eating raw marrow with ice-cream.

After she’s had the baby, done the OK photo shoot and obligingly shown off said precious bundle it all goes downhill and becomes  a media free-for-all.Why hasn`t she lost that baby weight yet? Why’s she depressed when she`s got lots of money and round the clock nannies? Should she be going back to work so soon? Does she breast feed?

All these questions in some shape or another have been asked for millenia at the water well,over washing lines and in recent times, at the coffee shop. The only thing is, now these questions are amplified through the media, and so the stereotype of the Yummy Mummy in upper/middle class circles or MILF in working class circles has appeared, demonstrating that women’s only true commodity is to be fuckable. Crude but more to the point.
These stereotypes trickle down into society, and,  in my experience the ‘Yummy Mummies’ at my kid`s school (by the by, I live in social housing in a very desirable area and professional families frequently relocate from London to get into the schools catchment area)always look fantastic have the latest bicycle and trailer sets,talk play dates, eat organic food and about the marvelous kids boutique in town.There is one middle class mum there who talks to her child, doesn’t give a crap about her appearance and seems to do lots of volunteer work for the school ,but it doesn’t matter how marvelous she is, the nasty whispers are still there `Why doesn`t she lose some weight/Get some new clothes ? / Put some make-up on?’ (n.b I`m a semi goth skinny person who can look slightly scary to the untrained eye).
Of course this happens at school gates throughout the land and in also media land,  but why does it happen? Consider the facts -the media is controlled and bankrolled by men and what do men do when the empowerment of women is seeped into the national consciouness? Give us what we want thats, what,the gossip. How else do the media get away with giving meek reports about women sacked for being pregnant, or for asserting their right to extended maternity leave which in short costs money, money that most important commodity of all.  This all  shortly followed by hiring an attractive younger woman to read the news, in order to attract male viewers.
It seems now (sadly) that even after we`ve competed with each other in order to secure said Mr Wonderful (I realise this statement is heteronormative, but lesbian motherhood does tend to be ignored by the media at large unless it’s being reported in a negative way and I have no experience of being a lesbian mother and so am basing this on my  personal experience of motherhood and competition) that competition is  nothing compared to pursuing the crown of `perfect woman`- it’s the perfect housewife amplified with new and improved features .Marvel at her organizational skills! She`s still fuckable after four kids! She makes her own organic baby food and brings home the bacon too!

The point is is that the media amplified and commodified women’s competitiveness, packaged it,sold it back to us in glossy form and we’ve brought it in every sense

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Candy Girl- Diablo Cody
Ok- let’s first get out the way that this is the women who wrote ‘Juno’ which is one of the best damn movies I have EVER seen, a woman who is so hip it hurts and who I am thus inclined to adore.

BEFORE  she went and wrote Juno, Diablo spent a year being a stripper and Candy Girl talks quite frankly about how she got into stripping – if you want a tale of childhood abuse, drugs and male violence then go somewhere else- Diablo has a college education, appears to be/or to have identified as a  feminist and has a perfectly happy nuclear family which contains both her birth parents and grew up in a perfectly nice middle class setting. The book is an all nighter- I couldn’t put it down. It’s well written, funny and full of dry wit and sarcasm which I like, and chocka with rock/punk/alternative references (she stripped to Aerosmith, Def Leppard and the Pixies!), although the hipster slang does get a little wearing in places. I’d recommend it as a pop corn read- won’t tax your brain or make you fat, but it is interesting and representative of the bubblegum pink hair and Suicide Girls era. I may just have to add Diablo Cody to my hero’s list.

Tags: ,

Hair today, gone tomorrow

A very close friend of mine, recently had some fairly serious thoughts about shaving her hair. In the end, she didn’t do it. But in the course of chatting with her about it I was struck by how much women identify with and are identified by  their hair.

Hair is that great symbol of femininity. Grown the way it ‘should be’, long luscious locks denote fertility, sex appeal and an essential difference between the sexes. Because obviously men have short hair. Obviously. So lust inducing is hair, that various cultures and religious groups have rules about women covering their hair. So it makes sense, with societal notions of how hair ‘should’ be that our hair also provides us with an immediate, reasonably easy and very visible way to be subversive.

Throughout my life, my hair has been an act of rebellion and subversity (I may have made that word up *shrug*). As a young child my step father cut my hair very short, telling me I was ugly and unlovable and didn’t deserve to have long hair like nice girls. Instead I was to be unnatural in his eyes – a girl who looked like a boy, who frequently behaved like a boy and who had to be beaten into something resembling what a woman should be.  As a teen, living away from that environment with my father and step mother I grew my hair long to escape the memories that haunted me and experimented with feminine clothes, make up and some initial, rather sedate trips into the world of hair dye.

Then my late teens hit and with that I came out of my closet, revelled in having a name to describe the funny feelings I got from noticing cute girls as well as cute boys. Away went the cutesy, sloaney feminine clothes and in came combats, big boots, tight tee’s crew cuts, spikes, black hair dye, pillar box red hair dye, vest tops, piercings tattoos and so on. Revelling in my new found and ever evolving identity as a being independent of the parental figures who’d abused me or who hadn’t but who’s guidance I saw as obstructive, I cut my hair every week, experimenting with colour and texture in ways I’d never thought I could. One week I’d have a soft razor cut emover, the next two inch spikes and a shaven neck and scalp. My hair became a way of expressing my turmoil, and my developing identity through my sexuality and exploration of my gender. At the time I didn’t recognize that though. I was just trying to find the look that was ‘me’.

At 18, I married and had children and went from being a hell raising baby punk with a lip ring and a ‘tude to being a hippy earth mother, with velvet skirts and flowy tops. I still wore leather jeans, but only on the back of my husbands motorcycle, I didn’t work and mostly I did as I was told. I grew my hair long again and the pillar box red and angry blue- black shades of dye were replaced with hennas, as I embraced pagan spirituality and a more ‘natural’ approach to life. This docile attitude couldn’t last though and I struggled to embrace this image of female behaviour – I loved having children, but I missed working and being respected for my intellect and fiery temper. I missed being know as a punky girl who was a little bit mad, but hard working, kind hearted, hard partying and fun. In those years I faded into the background, attempting through my hair to either hide myself or demonstrate how grown up I was, even at the tender age of 20.

Come 22, and my husband and I ended things and in the midst of trying to recover from the break up – a messy time of experiences that looking back on it,  were rather damaging, but at the time seemed as if I was having ‘fun’, I finally did something I had always wished I had, had the guts to do and dyed my hair Pink. I don’t mean a bit pink I mean PINK. This was a strong angry colour that said ‘Yeah, I’m here, I’m me and I’m fierce. I have pink hair!’. In a lot of ways that was me breaking free – once again my identity was evolving and I chose to show that visibly with the colour of my hair – a strong fierce colour I had always wanted to dye my hair but always been to afraid to do. Part of that time was built around having the courage to move away from the shit that had happened to me and to realise who I actually was and not to be afraid any more. It was around the same time I began to consciously and publicly identify as a feminist, and I attended my university interview with bright pink hair, in head to toe black with purple doc martins on.

University has again changed me – In the last 18 months I’ve solidified my feminist identity, although constructing an image and blueprint of my gender identity is still progressing – I gone from being a very skinny bulimic size ten, turning up to Uni in short skirts, fishnets and new rocks with pig tails, to an obese (but healthier, non- purging, non smoking) me hiding behind men’s t shirts, sports bras and baggy jeans, to dressing in head to toe Monsoon in order to look professional. In this time I’ve had black hair, dark blond hair (my natural colour, believe it or not), red-brown hair and currently bright red hair. I started uni with long hair, have chopped it all off and gone back to the shaved back emovers of my youth and grown that all out into a slightly messy chin length bob, that if I’m honest, needs a damn good cutting.

My point with this long and somewhat reflexive post is to demonstrate how much hair is wrapped up in our identity. It’s not just stuff that grows out of our heads – through our hair we can demonstrate sub cultural affiliation, cultural or religious beliefs, personal identity, gender identity, subvert gender identity – the list goes on. Hair is important, precisely because it is part of us and how we present ourselves. I invite every one of you to look back through your hair history. How many hair cuts or changes have you had because a relationship broke down, because a parent or authority figure said you shouldn’t, because you wanted to demonstrate belonging or project a professional image?? I invite you to share your stories of how you have shown your identity, and your life through your hair, because I think that whilst it seems insignificant, hair and the things we do or don’t do to it can, show us an awful lot about ourselves, each other and the world in which we live.

Tags: , , , , ,

« Older entries