Politics

You are currently browsing articles tagged Politics.

A quick one.

Watching the news whilst munching on my cereal this morning I was horrified to be informed by those nice people at the BBC that the government, in their infinate wisdom, have decided to introduce Welfare reforms . My problem isn’t with Welfare reforms being introduced- my problem is with how these reforms are going to massively impact adversely on the lives of lone parents- the over whelming majority of which are women.

Whilst I’m very much of the opinion that the welfare system should provide people with support when recquired at the most desperate times and should be delivered in such a way, as to provide individuals and families positive opportunities to change and to undertake training/education and provide a stepping point into the work force, these new reforms are at best, discriminatory and at worst down right bloody evil.

If the government want more single mothers working and not on benefits then they need to introduce a widespread system of free childcare open to all. They need to provide more funding for un educated parents to access education- even with the Dependents grant added onto my student loan I’m still only about 6-700 pounds a term better off than my colleagues who don’t have children and also qualify for income assessed student loan payments. That £700 might seem a lot but when you take into account my child care bills, travel, cost of books (which I have to buy because I can’t access the library during opening hours) it’s not much.

There are folks who will argue that becuase women like myself  are able to get off of benefits, go to university and study whilst working, and looking after our children why can’t everyone else? And my answer to those people is always this: I’m ‘brave’ to the point of stupidity. I’m also terribly middle class and education is more of a priority for me than a stable income. I can se how that won’t work for other people who are unwilling to want to enter education/ training programs unless they are garunteed a stable income. Why would you remove yourself from benefits, which contrary to what the media would have you belive, are a pittance, but a stable pittance, to go into the workforce or education which comes with limited, expensive childcare and an unstable income. Despite labour freforms most employers are still notoriously difficult when it comes to working flexi- time or having time off to care foir sick/ill children or attend events like school plays and sports days.

This new set of welfare reforsm discirminates against women and children becuase it doesn’t make allowances for the real difficulties faced by these families. Welfare reform is all well and good Mr Brown, but unless you bring in infrastructure reforms alongside them you are condemning women and their families to a lifetime full of penalisation for circumstances they cannot change.

Tags: , ,

David Willetts is the Shadow Universities Secretary, and this week, is winning a special award for being a singulalry sexist nincompoop. He wins said award for his recent speech claiming that the family is threatened by a rise in the number of young women attending university.

According to Mr Willetts, the 10% difference between the gender when it comes to university education is threatening the family- men can no longer ‘bring home the bacon’, which means marriages break up, the family as an economic institution fails and well won’t somebody please think of the children.

I’ve no problem with Mr Willett saying that 35% of men vs 45% of women attending university is something that needs addressing. I’ve also no problem with him pointing out, that the overwhelming majority of young people Not In Education, Employment or Training (NEET) are young men , and that perhaps we need to examine the causes of this and do something about it.

What does vex me mightily is his claim that this is the fault of women- that women wanting to improve their lives and undertaking higher education, something denied to them for hundreds of years, is to blame for these young men’s lack of higher education. That somehow women improving themselves destroys the very fabric of our society, when I would have considered it to , logically, improve our society and improve the economic stability of the family. His notion that there is only a finite amount of education to go round is disturbing and as Jess at the F Word pointed out based on a disturbingly middle class presumption that no one from the working classes might want an education, and that rather than panicking that more middle class women are accessing higher education, we should instead examine why more people across the board aren’t accessing university level education.

I find the Conservatives to be a generally depressing political party- as far as they are concerned people deserve everything that ever happens to them, and it isn’t the job of the government to help anyone, because well if they can’t sort it out themselves they don’t deserve the help anyway. They uphold ridiculous ‘traditional’ views of gender roles and seem to think that the only way a relationship or a family can function is if the man (because in Tory land no one is gay and if they are they are very discreet about it and don’t presume to have families!)  has a nice job and works hard to bring in the money and his nice little wife stays at home and bakes and sews and deals with the children. The children will of course, be terribly nice, polite children who do their homework and don’t get into fights or take drugs and only the children of unemployed, drug abusing single mothers who don’t deserve any government help at all, will ever get into a trouble at school or with the police. Anyone outside of those norms is well, nontraditional, and thus threatening the security of ‘the family’ and thus the very fabric of society as we know it. Which means we should all sneer at them and denounce them and come up with special policies to keep them and their kind on their little council estates and living in the poverty they so rightly deserve.

I expected better really. Unrealistic- but seeing as Mr ‘call me Dave’ Cameron and his cronies looked to be seriously considering some family freindly, equality based policies – I was hopefull. Now I’m despondant. It’s just all going to be the same classist, sexist, racist shite as always. So don’t vote for the Conservatives people. Becuase like their American counterparts, they’d cheerfully see us all living back in some unrealistic vision of the 1950′s where men are men and women are unpaid domestic labour and baby machines, kept forcibly uneducated, sexually repressed and slaves to their biology.

Tags: , ,

On general other blog reading..

Go read this piece about single teen parenting. It is very good and as someone who had her kids at 18 and 19 respectively – I agree with every damn thing Lauren said. I had to deal with the stigma against teenage mums. To my shame I got round it – I was married at 19, so those disapproving old ladies who made comments about ‘those girls getting themselves pregnant to get houses and money’ got a ‘Yes, my HUSBAND and I totally agree there’ from me.

Now at 25, and divorced I’m a little more secure in myself and couldn’t give a monkeys bum what anyone thinks of my state of motherhood or my marital state, but at 19 with two infants and painfully insecure, in a situation I wasn’t grown up enough to handle and with Internet message boards as pretty much my only support , I cared. For my part in agreeing with those people and their misogynistic, classist and just plain old mean statements, I feel a level of shame.

Teenagers, and here readers is a fact, will ALWAYS HAVE SEX!! It will always happen. Becuase of this, and becuase of the bizzare attitudes we as a society have towards sex, contraception, abortion, and teenagers having sex, there will also always be teenagers getting pregnant and having babies.

So rather than blaming teens for doing what their bodies are telling them, rather than blaming them for ending up in a situation, that could quite feasibly have an awful lot to do with how we as grown ups conduct ourselves, and teach them to be grown ups, shouldn’t we be supporting our teen parents, and helping them continue growing as people , helping them into futures of independence and helping them become the excellent parents they like everyone else have the potential to be?

Tags: , , ,

The Inevitable post about Palin.

Being as I’m British, I haven’t really had much to say in Bloglandia about the American Election. I just wish our elections got as much coverage stateside as the American one gets back here in Blighty!!

That said though, I do have to question exactly what the hell John McCain was thinking when he picked Sarah Palin. I mean really, you would think that being an experienced Statesman (not to mention a POW *rollseyes*) he would have considred that picking a candidate with foreign policy experience, Senate experience and well general ‘has lived outside of Home-state at least for college’ to be important. You would think he would have considered that he is in fact old. And it’s a stressful job running America. Whilst I’m not for a second going to say someone old isn’t capable of running a country (because that’s bollocks and also highly ageist), I am going to say that given his age, he should have considered the likelihood that he MAY pass away whilst in Office and be looking to pick a candidate for the position of Vice President who is capable, at least on paper, of taking over the leadership of the USA at a moments notice and doing a good job of it.

Instead he picks a candidate who has no foreign policy experience and who appears to know very little about ‘truth’, ‘decency’ and ‘working for the good of the people’.

Palins pick is historical- for starters she’s a woman, she’s a working Mother (which is not an easy thing to be). The more I read about her though, the more I am absolutely convinced that either a) John McCain has taken complete leave of his senses and picked an idiot or b) John  McCain has made what he considers to be a shrewd political decision in picking a WOMAN regardless of her abilities or qualifications to be VP on the grounds that it will curry him favour with the scores of women pissed off that Hillary didn’t get the Democrat Nomination and the scores of women pissed off that Obama then chose Joe Biden to be VP.

Actually, I think both a) and b) are true. Thing is McCain hasn’t just picked a woman, he has managed to handpick perfectly a woman who represents just about everything I think is wrong with the Republicans and conservatism in general. She’s anti-choice, pro-abstinence, she hunts, she’s pro-drilling (and lying about it), her morals are distinctly questionable (*see Troopergate, ladies and gentlemen) and to top it all off, we all now know about how her actions meant that rape victims in Wasilla were forced to pay for their own Rape Kits leading to Alaska having to pass a State Law making this illegal.

So erm yeah. Palin = More of the same old Republican shit, dressed up in a package to try and appeal to women and fool the people generally that voting for McCain won’t be another 4 years of the last 8 years of shite.

Don’t do it people please. For the love of any deity/non-deity/the universe at large please vote for the nice people who have a reasonable grasp of economics, a non-isolationist approach to foreign policy and a decent track record of reproductive rights, women’s rights and fighting against VAW.

Tags: , , , , , , , ,

So I’ve noticed that there is a resurgence in the good ole theme of trans v cis feminist fighting. Radical cisgendered feminists are often  accused of discriminating against transgender feminists and the whole “are trans issues women’s issues?” questioning starts again.

So before I get to the bit where I express my opinions here are some links. First of all, go and read this. Then go and check out the links in this post over at Renegade Evolution. Remember when reading these – check your privilege. There are levels of privilege and cisgendered women have privilege in comparison to transgendered women. Key part of that sentence is WOMEN.

As (cisgendered) feminists we fight against being judged, discriminated against or categorised according to our biological sex. We argue that womanhood is more than biology, that we are more than our genitalia, that we should not be constrained by our ability to or not become pregnant or judged and valued solely by the fact we have vagina’s.We argue that GENDER is a social construct, and that we are socialised into a certain gender according to the gender binary which may or may not be at odds with our biological SEX which is another thing all together. We argue against the binary, pointing out that gender like sexuality is not a ‘pure’ static thing, but fluid and changeable throughout life.

So why in the face of these arguments then, do some groups of feminists insist that trans women are not women and seek to exclude them from women only spaces? I can understand there being some issues about trans men in women only spaces, and Kit over at Today I am a Boy has a great post up about her feelings on transitioning and gendered spaces. What I don’t get is excluding trans women from women only spaces. They too are women and face the same discrimination as cis women and then some more for being trans. That isn’t to mention other discrimination against trans WOC or queer trans women.

To me this discrimination makes those who perpetrate it no better than the system we fight against and seek to change. Maybe because I am a bi/queer woman whose own gender identity is not strictly conforming to my biology, I am more sympathetic to those whose biological sex is totally at odds with their gender. Maybe I’m just a very nondiscriminatory person. I don’t know.

What I do know is that in my not-at-all-humble opinion, trans women are every bit as female, as women identified cis females. I also know that gender is a social construct and is far more fluid than the binary allows socially acceptable gender identification. And I also know that trampling over other underprivileged groups in our fight for equality is the wrong damn way to be fighting.

Tags: , , , ,

Wow…

The Conservatives have said something that is A) eminently sensible and B) I approve of.

Drawing the link between popular images of women and their presentation and problems experienced in wider society can only be a good thing.

Whilst I disagree with their approach to abortion, and the ‘More marriageable working class men’ plan, the Tories do at the moment seem to have the best approach to both gender equality and ending poverty. No they aren’t perfect – they are still overwhelmingly white, middle/upper class ridiculously privileged men. But to be fair look what Labour have done and are doing. Seems no one can ever win in this game we call politics sometimes.

Of course whether the Tories out their money where there mouth is and instigate any of these great plans they have is another matter altogether……

Tags: , , ,

Newer entries »